Jane S. Richardson

Duke University — United States

Materials Science · Physical Sciences

63h-index91.2kcitations242works4.82yr avg
OpenAlex↗ORCID↗Google Scholar↗Lab page↗

Accepting Students?

No reports yet. Know if this professor is taking students?

Research Topics

Enzyme Structure and Function(120), Protein Structure and Dynamics(100), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms(60), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research(22), Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications(16)

Publications242 total

Categorizing prediction modes within low-pLDDT regions of <i>AlphaFold</i> 2 structures: near-predictive, pseudostructure and barbed wire
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology·2025· 2 citedOpen Access
RNAprecis: Prediction of full-detail RNA conformation from the experimentally best- observed sparse parameters
Structural Dynamics·2025Open Access
Categorizing prediction modes within low-pLDDT regions of AlphaFold2 structures
2025Open Access
<i>Cis</i> ‐ <scp>nonProline</scp> peptides: Genuine occurrences and their functional roles
Protein Science·2025· 1 citedOpen Access
Rare conformations in RNA backbone
Structural Dynamics·2025Open Access
Almost, but not quite, entirely unlike proteins
Structural Dynamics·2025Open Access
RNAprecis: Prediction of full-detail RNA conformation from the experimentally best-observed sparse parameters
2025· 1 citedOpen Access
Outcomes of the EMDataResource cryo-EM Ligand Modeling Challenge
Nature Methods·2024· 17 citedOpen Access
La Justice pénale numérique en France et au Royaume-Uni
Éditions Panthéon-Assas eBooks·2024
Community recommendations on cryoEM data archiving and validation
IUCrJ·2024· 30 citedOpen Access
Outcomes of the EMDataResource Cryo-EM Ligand Modeling Challenge
2024· 2 citedOpen Access
AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses and accelerate but do not replace experimental structure determination
Nature Methods·2023· 303 citedOpen Access
The bad and the good of trends in model building and refinement for sparse-data regions: pernicious forms of overfitting versus good new tools and predictions
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology·2023· 6 citedOpen Access
Alphafold changes everything (and nothing)
Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances·2023· 1 citedOpen Access
A disulfide bridge survey and library
Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances·2023Open Access
High-quality RNA residues: RNA2023
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)·2023Open Access
High-quality RNA residues: RNA2023
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)·2023· 1 citedOpen Access
Accelerating crystal structure determination with iterative <i>AlphaFold</i> prediction
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology·2023· 56 citedOpen Access
AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses, and accelerate but do not replace experimental structure determination
2022· 49 citedOpen Access
Accelerating crystal structure determination with iterative AlphaFold prediction
2022· 7 citedOpen Access
page 1 of 13Next →

Frequent Co-authors

David Richardson(35), Paul D. Adams(12), Pavel V. Afonine(10), Vincent B. Chen(10), Jeffrey J. Headd(9), Ian Davis(8), Nigel W. Moriarty(8), Randy J. Read(8), Thomas C. Terwilliger(8), W.B. Arendall(8), Gary J. Kapral(7), Airlie J. McCoy(6), Simon C. Lovell(6), Li‐Wei Hung(5), Ralf W. Grosse‐Kunstleve(5), Robert D. Oeffner(5), Peter H. Zwart(5), Michael G. Prisant(5), Christopher J. Williams(5), J. Michael Word(5)