Robert Edson

Medicine · Health Sciences

19h-index2.0kcitations41works0.02yr avg
OpenAlex↗Google Scholar↗

Accepting Students?

No reports yet. Know if this professor is taking students?

Research Topics

Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics(9), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes(8), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management(7), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases(6), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research(5)

Publications41 total

Long-Term Mortality Follow-Up of Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial
Circulation·2022· 21 citedOpen Access
In-Stent Restenosis in Saphenous Vein Grafts (from the DIVA Trial)
The American Journal of Cardiology·2021· 6 citedOpen Access
Response by Latif et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial"
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions·2020Open Access
Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
PMC·2020
Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions·2020· 18 citedOpen Access
TCT-675 Direct Stenting Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2019
TCT-674 In-Stent Restenosis in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Insights From the DIVA trial
Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2019
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein grafts: a double-blind, randomised trial
The Lancet·2018· 81 citedOpen Access
Rationale and design of the Drug‐Eluting Stents vs Bare‐Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty (DIVA) Trial
Clinical Cardiology·2017· 13 citedOpen Access
Methods and Timing of Randomization
2017
At-Home Versus In-Clinic INR Monitoring: A Cost–Utility Analysis from The Home INR Study (THINRS)
Journal of General Internal Medicine·2016· 20 citedOpen Access
Does distance modify the effect of self-testing in oral anticoagulation?
PubMed·2016· 1 cited
The impact of frequency of patient self-testing of prothrombin time on time in target range within VA Cooperative Study #481: The Home INR Study (THINRS), a randomized, controlled trial
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis·2014· 23 cited
Erratum: Use of a Simple Symptom Questionnaire to Predict Barrett's Esophagus in Patients With Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux
The American Journal of Gastroenterology·2014· 1 cited
Abstract 10606: More Frequent Self-Testing of Prothrombin Time Results in Improved Time in Target Range
Circulation·2012
More Frequent Self-Testing of Prothrombin Time Results in Improved Time in Target Range
Circulation·2012· 3 cited
Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data
The Lancet·2011· 372 citedOpen Access
Effect of Home Testing of International Normalized Ratio on Clinical Events
New England Journal of Medicine·2010· 265 cited
An evaluation of patient self-testing competency of prothrombin time for managing anticoagulation: pre-randomization results of VA Cooperative Study #481–The Home INR Study (THINRS)
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis·2010· 19 cited
Response to Letter Regarding Article, “DITPA (3,5-Diiodothyropropionic Acid), a Thyroid Hormone Analog to Treat Heart Failure: Phase II Trial Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study”
Circulation·2010· 1 citedOpen Access
page 1 of 3Next →

Frequent Co-authors

Philip W. Lavori(15), Lauren Uyeda(14), Steven Goldman(11), Mei‐Chiung Shih(10), Alan K. Jacobson(9), David B. Matchar(9), Emmanouil S. Brilakis(9), Subhash Banerjee(9), Lenard A. Adler(8), John Rotrosen(8), Sunil V. Rao(8), Bavana V. Rangan(8), Kreton Mavromatis(8), Deepak L. Bhatt(7), David R. Holmes(7), Faisal Latif(7), Barry F. Uretsky(7), Rowena J Dolor(6), Ciaran S. Phibbs(6), Kendrick Shunk(6)