Jonathan J. Koehler

Social Sciences · Social Sciences

26h-index3.0kcitations121works1.02yr avg
OpenAlex↗Google Scholar↗

Accepting Students?

No reports yet. Know if this professor is taking students?

Research Topics

Jury Decision Making Processes(32), Forensic and Genetic Research(28), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems(27), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics(18), Deception detection and forensic psychology(8)

Publications121 total

A response to EA-4/23 INF:2025 “The Assessment and Accreditation of Opinions and Interpretations using ISO/IEC 17025:2017”
Forensic Science International·2025· 1 cited
The scientific reinvention of forensic science
CrimRxiv·2023· 1 citedOpen Access
The scientific reinvention of forensic science
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences·2023· 22 citedOpen Access
Inconclusive Conclusions in Forensic Science: Rejoinders to Scurich, Morrison, Sinha & Gutierrez
SSRN Electronic Journal·2023Open Access
Inconclusive conclusions in forensic science: rejoinders to Scurich, Morrison, Sinha and Gutierrez
Law Probability and Risk·2022· 6 cited
Inconclusives are not errors: a rejoinder to Dror
Law Probability and Risk·2022· 9 cited
Inconclusives and error rates in forensic science: a signal detection theory approach
Law Probability and Risk·2021· 33 cited
Fingerprint error rate on close non‐matches
Journal of Forensic Sciences·2020· 27 cited
Forensic Source Conclusions
Zeitschrift für Psychologie·2020· 5 cited
Forensic Source Conclusions: Twenty Threats to Validity
SSRN Electronic Journal·2020· 1 citedOpen Access
Fingerprint Error Rate on Close Non-Matches
SSRN Electronic Journal·2020· 1 citedOpen Access
Certainty & Uncertainty in Reporting Fingerprint Evidence
Daedalus·2018· 11 cited
Symposium on forensic expert testimony, Daubert, and rule 702
Fordham law review·2018· 2 cited
How Trial Judges Should Think About Forensic Science Evidence
Judicature·2018· 10 cited
Certainty and Uncertainty in Reporting Fingerprint Evidence
SSRN Electronic Journal·2018· 2 citedOpen Access
Jury simulation goals.
American Psychological Association eBooks·2017· 8 cited
Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims
Journal of Law and the Biosciences·2016· 60 citedOpen Access
Science, technology, or the expert witness: What influences jurors’judgments about forensic science testimony?
Psychology Public Policy and Law·2016· 48 citedOpen Access
An Empirical Research Agenda for the Forensic Sciences
eYLS (Yale Law School)·2016· 1 citedOpen Access
Statistical Evidence in Court
Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science·2016
page 1 of 7Next →

Frequent Co-authors

Michael J. Saks(7), David H. Kaye(5), Jennifer L. Mnookin(4), Simon A. Cole(3), D. Michael Risinger(3), Itiel E. Dror(2), Barry A.J. Fisher(2), Keith Inman(2), Glenn Langenburg(2), Norah Rudin(2), Jay Siegel(2), David A. Stoney(2), Andrew D. Gershoff(2), Thomas D. Lyon(2), Robert A. Prentice(2), Hal R. Arkes(2), Max Houk(1), Molly Mercer(1), Max M. Houck(1), Laura Macchi(1)