David Moher

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill — United States

Decision Sciences · Social Sciences

213h-index827.7kcitations1.5kworks13.92yr avg
OpenAlex↗ORCID↗Google Scholar↗Lab page↗

Accepting Students?

No reports yet. Know if this professor is taking students?

Research Topics

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews(693), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life(307), Delphi Technique in Research(196), Clinical practice guidelines implementation(152), Health Sciences Research and Education(132)

Publications1.5k total

Funders’ expectations for open science in cardiovascular research: A Scoping review of the largest cardiovascular research funders
2025Open Access
What goes in a funder’s Narrative CV?: A Scoping Review
F1000Research·2025Open Access
MATES: A tool for appraising the completeness with which a meta-analysis has been reported
Environment International·2025Open Access
The Risk of Bias in Vaccine Effectiveness (RoB-VE) project: introduction to a methodological initiative to improve risk-of-bias assessment and reporting in vaccine effectiveness research
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2025Open Access
Efficacy, all-cause discontinuation, and safety of serotonergic psychedelics and MDMA to treat mental disorders: A living systematic review with meta-analysis
European Neuropsychopharmacology·2025· 1 citedOpen Access
Aligning SPIRIT and SAGER guidelines for equity in clinical trials – Authors’ reply
The Lancet·2025
Reproducibility of meta-analytic results in systematic reviews of interventions: meta-research study
BMJ Medicine·2025· 1 citedOpen Access
Fostering open science and responsible research practices: A pre-post study
F1000Research·2025Open Access
Attitudes and perceptions towards the use of artificial intelligence chatbots in medical journal peer review: A protocol for a large-scale, international cross-sectional survey
European Science Editing·2025Open Access
Consistent and Precise Description of Research Outputs Could Improve Implementation of Open Science
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science·2025Open Access
P287 CALLS FOR ENGAGING PATIENT PARTNERS HAVE LARGELY GONE UNHEARD IN CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
Canadian Journal of Cardiology·2025
Review: From Form to Formation. Biomedical Reporting Standards in Practice (Round 1 - Review 1)
2025
The STARD-AI reporting guideline for diagnostic accuracy studies using artificial intelligence
Nature Medicine·2025· 40 citedOpen Access
Attitudes and perceptions of biomedical journal editors in chief towards the use of artificial intelligence chatbots in the scholarly publishing process: a cross-sectional survey
Research Integrity and Peer Review·2025· 1 citedOpen Access
Practice of data sharing plans in clinical trial registrations and concordance between registered and published data sharing plans: a cross-sectional study
BMC Medicine·2025Open Access
It's time for an update: AGREE III, the next iteration of guideline appraisal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2025· 2 cited
Making bibliometric reporting more transparent and consistent: Participants needed for pilot testing of GLOBAL
2025Open Access
Knowledge and usage of the Reporting Guidelines: a survey among Brazilian Health Research Group Leaders
Encontros Bibli Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação·2025Open Access
Author response for "Consistent and Precise Description of Research Outputs Could Improve Implementation of Open Science"
2025
Consistent and precise description of research outputs could improve implementation of open science
2025Open Access
page 1 of 76Next →

Frequent Co-authors

Douglas G. Altman(24), Jennifer Tetzlaff(22), Cynthia D. Mulrow(13), Isabelle Boutron(11), Larissa Shamseer(11), Peter C Gøtzsche(11), Kenneth F. Schulz(11), Patrick M. Bossuyt(10), Alessandro Liberati(10), Matthew J. Page(9), Tammy Hoffmann(9), Lesley Stewart(9), Andrea C. Tricco(9), Joanne E. McKenzie(8), Elie A. Akl(8), Julie Glanville(8), Jeremy Grimshaw(8), Asbjørn Hróbjartsson(8), Elizabeth Loder(8), Vivian Welch(8)