Julian J. Bommer

Imperial College London — United Kingdom

Engineering · Physical Sciences

74h-index19.7kcitations224works4.02yr avg
OpenAlex↗ORCID↗Google Scholar↗Lab page↗

Accepting Students?

No reports yet. Know if this professor is taking students?

Research Topics

Seismic Performance and Analysis(153), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques(75), earthquake and tectonic studies(70), Seismic Waves and Analysis(67), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures(29)

Publications224 total

Reply to “Comment on ‘Estimating the Maximum Magnitude of Induced Earthquakes in the Groningen Gas Field, the Netherlands’ by Julian J. Bommer, Jan van Elk, and Mark D. Zoback” by Charles Vlek
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America·2025
The Maximum Magnitude of Natural and Induced Earthquakes
2024Open Access
The maximum magnitude of natural and induced earthquakes
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources·2024· 9 citedOpen Access
Estimating the Maximum Magnitude of Induced Earthquakes in the Groningen Gas Field, the Netherlands
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America·2024· 5 cited
The Maximum Magnitude of Natural and Induced Earthquakes
2024· 6 citedOpen Access
Seismic Source Zones for Site-Specific Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: The Very Real Questions Raised by Virtual Fault Ruptures
Seismological Research Letters·2023· 7 cited
A database of ground motion recordings, site profiles, and amplification factors from the Groningen gas field in the Netherlands
Earthquake Spectra·2022· 11 citedOpen Access
Ground-motion prediction models for induced earthquakes in the Groningen gas field, the Netherlands
Journal of Seismology·2022· 18 citedOpen Access
Construction of a Ground-Motion Logic Tree through Host-to-Target Region Adjustments Applied to an Adaptable Ground-Motion Prediction Model
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America·2022· 10 cited
Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering·2022· 68 citedOpen Access
Attenuation relations for use in Europe: An overview
2022· 17 cited
Derivation of a near-surface damping model for the Groningen gas field
Geophysical Journal International·2022· 10 citedOpen Access
Host‐region parameters for an adjustable model for crustal earthquakes to facilitate the implementation of the backbone approach to building ground‐motion logic trees in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis
Earthquake Spectra·2022· 15 citedOpen Access
Comment on “Activation Rate of Seismicity for Hydraulic Fracture Wells in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin” by Hadi Ghofrani and Gail M. Atkinson
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America·2021· 10 cited
Incorporating dwelling mounds into induced seismic risk analysis for the Groningen gas field in the Netherlands
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering·2021· 6 citedOpen Access
Review of <i>Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis</i>
Seismological Research Letters·2021· 4 cited
Seismic Hazard and Risk Due to Induced Earthquakes at a Shale Gas Site
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America·2021· 24 cited
Capturing epistemic uncertainty in site response
Earthquake Spectra·2020· 39 cited
Green, yellow, red, or out of the blue? An assessment of Traffic Light Schemes to mitigate the impact of hydraulic fracturing-induced seismicity
Journal of Seismology·2020· 88 citedOpen Access
Selecting Ground-Motion Models for Site-Specific PSHA: Adaptability versus Applicability
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America·2020· 38 citedOpen Access
page 1 of 12Next →

Frequent Co-authors

Sinan Akkar(6), Frank Scherbaum(6), Norman Abrahamson(6), Helen Crowley(6), Jonathan Hancock(5), Fleur O. Strasser(5), Peter J. Stafford(5), Fabrice Cotton(4), Rui Pinho(4), S. Oates(3), H. Bungum(3), Juliet Bird(3), N. N. Ambraseys(2), Rishmila Mendis(2), Gian Michele Calvi(2), Guido Magenes(2), John Douglas(2), Donat Fäh(2), J. E. Alarcon(2), Amr S. Elnashai(2)