Jonathan A. Fugelsang

University of Waterloo — Canada

Neuroscience · Life Sciences

50h-index9.5kcitations214works1.12yr avg
OpenAlex↗ORCID↗Google Scholar↗Lab page↗

Accepting Students?

No reports yet. Know if this professor is taking students?

Research Topics

Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment(46), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics(41), Misinformation and Its Impacts(31), Gambling Behavior and Treatments(24), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies(20)

Publications209 total

Between Law and Conscience: The Role of Legality in Moral Decision-Making
2025Open Access
Trusting the Machine: How Anthropomorphism Impacts Epistemic Trust in Generative AI
2025Open Access
Everyone I don't like is biased: Affective evaluations and the bias blind spot
2025Open Access
Disclosing sample bias fails to fully correct judgments of partisan extremity
Cognition·2025· 1 citedOpen Access
Using conventional framing to offset bias against algorithmic errors
Judgment and Decision Making·2025· 1 citedOpen Access
Between Law and Conscience: Act Legality Shapes Moral Evaluation
SSRN Electronic Journal·2025Open Access
Partisan language in a polarized world: In-group language provides reputational benefits to speakers while polarizing audiences
Cognition·2024· 2 cited
Between Law and Conscience: The Role of Legality in Moral Decision-Making
2024Open Access
Everyone I don't like is biased: Affective evaluations and the bias blind spot
2024· 2 citedOpen Access
Extremely Partisan Samples Distort Perceptions of Group Beliefs
2024Open Access
The metacognitive abilities of narcissists: Individual differences between grandiose and vulnerable subtypes
Personality and Individual Differences·2024· 7 citedOpen Access
Partisan Language in a Polarized World: In-Group Language Provides Reputational Benefits to Speakers while Polarizing Audiences
2024· 1 citedOpen Access
Partisan Language in a Polarized World: In-Group Language Provides Reputational Benefits to Speakers While Polarizing Audiences
SSRN Electronic Journal·2024· 2 citedOpen Access
Biased Samples Distort Perceptions of Group Beliefs
SSRN Electronic Journal·2024Open Access
Not all bullshit pondered is tossed: Reflection decreases receptivity to some types of misleading information but not others
Applied Cognitive Psychology·2023· 1 citedOpen Access
The metacognitive abilities of narcissists: Individual differences between grandiose and vulnerable subtypes
2023· 1 citedOpen Access
Bullshit blind spots: the roles of miscalibration and information processing in bullshit detection
Thinking & Reasoning·2023· 18 cited
Response generation, not response execution, influences feelings of rightness in reasoning
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology·2023· 2 citedOpen Access
Broad effects of shallow understanding: Explaining an unrelated phenomenon exposes the illusion of explanatory depth
Judgment and Decision Making·2023· 5 citedOpen Access
Hypothesized drivers of the bias blind spot—cognitive sophistication, introspection bias, and conversational processes
Judgment and Decision Making·2022· 8 citedOpen Access
page 1 of 11Next →

Frequent Co-authors

Gordon Pennycook(16), Derek J. Koehler(14), Mike J. Dixon(10), Kevin Harrigan(10), James Allan Cheyne(8), Kevin Dunbar(7), Nathaniel Barr(6), Evan F. Risko(6), Erin A. Maloney(5), Candice Graydon(5), Jennifer A. Stolz(4), Adam E. Green(4), Daniel Ansari(4), Robert M. Ross(3), David J. M. Kraemer(3), Karen Collins(3), Vance V. MacLaren(3), Michelle Jarick(3), Jeremy R. Gray(2), Matthew E. Roser(2)