Marc D. Lewis

Psychology · Social Sciences

41h-index7.0kcitations113works0.02yr avg
OpenAlex↗Google Scholar↗

Accepting Students?

No reports yet. Know if this professor is taking students?

Research Topics

Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development(26), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies(25), Mental Health Research Topics(16), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies(13), Neural dynamics and brain function(12)

Publications113 total

Brain Change in Addiction: Disease or Learning?
2022· 4 cited
nothing for addictions to other substances or be- haviors . In reply to other criticisms , I have never weak-willed . And when I discourage “ obedience my target is the one-size-fits-all treatment phi- mous , that are still prevalent in the United States
PubMed Central·2019Open Access
Brain Change in Addiction as Learning, Not Disease
New England Journal of Medicine·2018· 116 cited
Complex Pathways to Psychopathology
Psychological Inquiry·2018· 4 cited
Challenging the brain disease model of addiction: European launch of the addiction theory network
Addiction Research & Theory·2017· 123 citedOpen Access
A Continuum is a Continuum, and Swans are Not Geese. Reply to Fenton & Wiers
Neuroethics·2017· 1 cited
Enough Comparing! Addiction is Its own Thing. Reply to Matthews
Neuroethics·2017
No Need for the Disease Label: Choice is Complicated. Reply to Heather
Neuroethics·2017
Self-Efficacy: Now You See It, Now You Don’t. Reply to Snoek
Neuroethics·2017
Resetting the Brain as Well as the Nomenclature. Reply to Szalavitz
Neuroethics·2017
Neurocentrism and Name-Calling: Let’s Agree to Agree. Reply to Satel & Lilienfeld
Neuroethics·2017
A Morass of Musings on Moralization. Reply to Frank and Nagel
Neuroethics·2017· 1 cited
Searching for Norms to Violate. Reply to Henden & Gjelsvik
Neuroethics·2017· 1 cited
A Graded Approach to “Disease” -- Help or Hindrance? Reply to Berridge
Neuroethics·2017· 13 cited
Choice Isn’t Simple. Reply to Pickard
Neuroethics·2017· 14 cited
Once More, with Feeling! Reply to Ainslie
Neuroethics·2017· 1 cited
What Evolution Intended? Reply to Wakefield
Neuroethics·2017· 2 cited
Brains are Important Too: Reply to Hall, Carter, and Barnett
Neuroethics·2017
Yes, Precision is a Good thing. Reply to Flanagan
Neuroethics·2017· 1 cited
Addiction and the Brain: Development, Not Disease
Neuroethics·2017· 189 citedOpen Access
page 1 of 6Next →

Frequent Co-authors

Connie Lamm(10), Isabela Granic(10), Philip David Zelazo(7), Rebecca M. Todd(6), Jim Stieben(5), Steven Woltering(5), Alan Fogel(5), Sidney J. Segalowitz(3), Debra Pepler(3), Tom Hollenstein(2), Zhong‐Xu Liu(2), Peter Gow(2), Angela Prencipe(1), Amanda Kesek(1), Julia E. Cohen‐Gilbert(1), Ross A. Thompson(1), Susan D. Calkins(1), David W. Evans(1), Emily A. Iobst(1), Arland O’Hara(1)